Salary Intelligence · Insights & Analysis
Observational analysis on compensation, EU Pay Transparency, and the salary intelligence that European SMEs were never given access to.
Featured article
Mercer charges €50k/year for a survey filled out six months ago by HR professionals estimating their own data. The output is sector averages. They don't know your company. Here is what that difference actually means for a 200-person HR Director with a June 2026 deadline.
"Mercer tells you what the market looks like. PayGapCheck tells you what your company looks like against it — and what you're about to do to it with your next hire."
Showing 12 articles
Same obligations apply to a 150-person company as to Volkswagen. Salary range disclosure before the first interview, equal pay for work of equal value, pay gap reporting by category. What needs to be in place before June 2026.
Article 4 establishes a broader equal-pay standard than identical jobs. Four criteria, gender-neutral methodology — the audit logic regulators are trained to test first.
Nine mandatory metrics. Four directive articles. One deadline. What to calculate, document, and publish — and in which order. No legal interpretation. Just the structure.
The directive does not require publishing individual salaries. It requires the company can answer the Article 7 request. How HR Directors communicate the pay framework before the first request determines whether the conversation is structured — or reactive.
The mean hides what the median reveals. A single Director at €200k pulls the department average up. The median shows where most people actually sit. These are not interchangeable.
Every above-market hire compresses the people already there. Within 18 months, the Senior who onboarded the new Mid earns less than them. The data shows exactly when this pattern was built.
The base gap is what companies report. The bonus gap is what companies would rather not see. PTD Article 8 includes both. This article shows how the two compound over time.
The offer that "feels fair" is not the same as the offer that is defensible. A defensible offer has a documented internal position, a cohort comparison, and a rationale that survives a PTD audit.
The question that anchored almost every offer in Europe for twenty years is prohibited. A documented salary range, disclosed before the first interview, replaces it. Most recruitment processes were never designed to function without salary history as the anchor.
Most salary band guides assume you have a C&B team, access to a €15k survey, and six months to implement. This one does not. This one is for the HR Director with a spreadsheet and a deadline.
A survey is a sample of declared intentions. A market signal is a real decision made by a real company about a real person. The difference is not one of quality. It is one of nature.
This is not a criticism of the product. It is an observation about the model. Salary survey data is filled in by HR professionals estimating their own company's numbers, with a year of lag. Here is what that means for a 200-person company.
Too large for manual Excel. Too small for Workday economics. Too cost-sensitive for Mercer. Too sophisticated to rely on gut feel. The regulation makes no distinctions. The tools market does.
When a per-category pay gap above 5% cannot be explained, Article 10 triggers a joint pay assessment with worker representatives. What that process looks like, what it produces, and what the company needs to have in hand before it starts.
A reported pay gap has two layers: the structural portion explained by objective factors, and the residual portion that cannot. Under the directive, only the residual matters.
Article 9 requires three views of the data: mean, median, and quartile distribution. The third metric reveals structural composition where the mean and median are silent.
A counter-offer keeps one person. The pay decision it embeds reshapes the cohort around them. Within 12 months, the compression it creates is observable in the data — and answerable under Article 7.
When a role takes 90 days to fill instead of 45, the recruiting funnel didn't get harder. The market just told you something about your pay band. Treating it as a sourcing problem misses the signal.
An annual raise cycle is one of the most consequential pay decisions a company makes — repeated for every employee, every year. The mechanism shapes the directive-sensitive gap as much as any single offer letter ever did.
A promotion changes the employee's level on paper. Whether it changes their pay position depends on whether the company has a documented promotion-pay relationship. Where the two disconnect, the data surfaces patterns the directive examines.
Distributed teams pay people from many places. The same role can carry a Berlin number, a Lisbon number, and a Bucharest number — all defensible in isolation. The directive examines them together.
Most European SMEs run compensation out of a shared spreadsheet. It scales surprisingly well — until the directive asks for a documented methodology, an audit trail, and reproducibility under scrutiny.
Any employee can request the comparator pay information. The employer has two months to respond. The day-to-day workflow that supports this is what the directive examines if a response is challenged.
The Directive contains two separate clocks. Most coverage collapses them into a single 2026 deadline. That collapse is where the 100-to-149 bracket goes quietly out of focus.
Article 18 changes who has to prove what. From transposition onward, three classes of HR records carry evidentiary weight they did not carry before. Most are not written yet.
The Directive's most-misunderstood obligation. A range that covers a 100% spread is not a range. A range with no methodology behind it is not defensible. Three patterns examined.
A 4% median pay difference paired with a 28% median bonus difference is a common shape across Article 9 filings. Two compounding mechanics produce it, and neither is base-pay discrimination.
A line-item anatomy of an SME-scale salary survey license. Four things it buys, four things it doesn't, and the part no benchmarking firm puts on its own pricing page.
One article every two weeks. No spam. No generic HR newsletters.
Observational analysis on compensation and pay equity across Europe.